Jump to content
LegacyGT.com

Project Legacy Gt outback begins...


Recommended Posts

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/08/7b4c2e8789ccba87b09de1a607bcafd1.jpg

 

Will be attempting to install the outback suspension from a 3.6r into my gt.

 

To be continued.....

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I do a lot of mountain biking. With the hitch, hitch rack, two bikes, misc gear, the rear suspension constantly bottoms out. Not to mention the saggy butt. The additional ground clearance helps in the snow northeast as well.

 

This is why I went for the 3.6r outback suspension vs the regular 2.5. The 3.6r outback has stiffer Springs all around.

 

I plan on getting a set of much bigger tires. Probably 235/55/18. With the 20mm spacers installed I think the bigger tires will fill up the wheel arches quite well.

 

I'll be doing the swap tomorrow. I'll take some detailed pictures to document the procedure.

 

 

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do a lot of mountain biking. With the hitch, hitch rack, two bikes, misc gear, the rear suspension constantly bottoms out. Not to mention the saggy butt. The additional ground clearance helps in the snow northeast as well.

 

This is why I went for the 3.6r outback suspension vs the regular 2.5. The 3.6r outback has stiffer Springs all around.

 

I plan on getting a set of much bigger tires. Probably 235/55/18. With the 20mm spacers installed I think the bigger tires will fill up the wheel arches quite well.

 

I'll be doing the swap tomorrow. I'll take some detailed pictures to document the procedure.

 

 

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

A before picture of my car with 225/55/17s.

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/08/f0dec6f542311e0eeccda87ace8936eb.jpg

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just finished up the install... Too dark to take any pictures. But the car is a good 2-3 inches higher.

 

Some observations,

 

1) the outback struts are approximately 2 inches longer.

 

2) the rear outback springs had one or two additional coil. So the rear outback Springs are longer.

 

3) rear upper control arms are very different between the gt and the outback. The camber will be way out of specs without the upper control arm swap.

 

4) Harbor freight ball joint extractor.... Life saver for getting the rear toe links off. Also needed an arm puller to get the upper arm off.

 

5) Rear toe links and trailing links are exactly the same between the outback and the gt.

 

6) the stock rear endlinks are barely long enough to fit. Might need to get ones made for the outback.

 

7) front struts are direct drop ins. No problems at all. Just had to push down the hub to fit the longer struts into the steering knuckle.

 

8) definitely need an alignment especially the rear since the camber and toe is way off. Definitely need the adjustable LCA to get the camber back into spec.

 

Overall I am happy with the swap. I got a solid ~3 inch lift. The rear is slightly higher than the front, but that's perfect for me since I carry bikes on my hitch all the time. I can definitely tell that the suspension feels better dampened and stiffer with the 3.6r outback suspension. Does not feel floaty at all. I prefer the ride with the 3.6r outback suspension vs the stock gt suspension.

 

 

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Edited by rpmk104
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So some pictures of the install.

 

1) Gt vs outback front strut. Notice the difference in length and the outback spring has half an additional coil.

 

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/10/61e0bb094e94c6a91b2adda66f6d33ed.jpg

 

2) gt vs outback rear. The outback spring has one more coil.

 

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/10/aeb263c6319677ad802da13574ddb154.jpg

 

3) gt vs outback vs megan racing adjustable toe link. The gt and outback rear toe links are identical. The megan racing link weights the most but is also very beefy.

 

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/10/b0c9951e1865cf8a4c58ec20381d0d9c.jpg

 

4) gt vs outback (red) vs j2 engineering adjustable rear lca. Gt and outback, identical. The J2 lca was the heaviest. The length of the stock lca, eyelid to eyelid is approximately 17.75". To get the rear camber any where near stock after the suspension swap, I needed to adjust the J2 lca to approximately 18.25".

 

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/10/13802a48bd851501a8640fcc1dc57fa8.jpg

 

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/10/ead15c35fca892054b668610a936091c.jpg

 

5) rear upper control arms. Gt on the right and outback on the left. The gt arm has a lot more upward curvature to it. The location of ball joint is also at a different angle. Additional the gt abs line bracket which attaches to the upper arms are slightly different. Needed to drill a new hole to reattach to the outback upper arms. The Gt upper control arm slightly heavier than the outback arm.

 

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/10/a2a58a6a09ae0b2a8800d270ecc5afda.jpg

 

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/10/8accfcd2f4b46592f3a97f1e0186f9cc.jpg

 

6) all parts installed.

 

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/10/152ab54c508db30dd2181be868b5a6bd.jpg

 

 

If I reused the stock Lca and the non adjustable toe links, I will probably end up with massive toe in and massive positive camber in the rear.

 

Still no pictures of the car yet... Will install the 20mm spacers in the next few days. Scheduled an appointment for alignment this Saturday. Let's see how off my alignment is.

 

 

 

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Edited by rpmk104
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use