| |
 |
|
|
#1:
10-09-2012, 10:25 AM
|
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R or Blizzak WS-70?
|
|
Title: Member
|
|
Location: Mississauga, ON
|
|
Car: 2005 Legacy GT LTD Wagon 5mt
|
|
Posts: 95
|
|
iTrader: (0)
|
|
In the years that I've owned my car, I've always opted to get better winter performing tires.
Firestone WinterForce --> Kumho KW17 --> Conti ExtremeWinterContact
For my wagon, I want to get the best for around $1000 budget!
I can get the WS-70 for $850 and I can get the Nokian's for $1050. Only $200 more!
If anyone can chime in for which ones I should opt for.. that would be great! How long the Nokian's last compared to the Blizzaks and such!
|
|
#2:
10-09-2012, 12:32 PM
|
|
|
Title: Contributing V.P.
|
|
Location: south jersey
|
|
Posts: 1,018
|
|
iTrader: (0)
|
|
I've had Nokian RSi snows for 6 seasons (maybe 30,000 miles) and they'll be good for a couple more. Amazing grip on ice and snow. I can't compare them to Bridgestones, but Nokian is a top seller in Canada and Russia so they must know something about cold weather tires.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bluesuby For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
#3:
10-09-2012, 12:38 PM
|
|
|
Title: Member
|
|
Location: Delaware Valley
|
|
Car: 2012 Subaru Legacy 2.5i Premium
|
|
Posts: 197
|
|
iTrader: (0)
|
|
General Altimax Arctic.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PrimeRib For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
#4:
10-09-2012, 12:49 PM
|
|
|
Title: Senior Member
|
|
Location: Carmel, NY
|
|
Car: 05 Legacy 2.5 GT Limited stage2
|
|
Posts: 217
|
|
iTrader: (0)
|
|
Bridgestone Blizzak
|
|
#5:
10-09-2012, 02:48 PM
|
|
|
Title: HighIntensityDenial
|
|
Location: Idaho
|
|
Car: '05 Legacy GT Wagon 5MT
|
|
Posts: 2,193
|
|
iTrader: (3)
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay-d
.........I can get the WS-70 for $850 and I can get the Nokian's for $1050. Only $200 more!
If anyone can chime in for which ones I should opt for.. that would be great! ........

|
It depends. What are you winter driving conditions like? Ice? Snow? Slush? Mostly dry? Mostly wet?
|
|
#6:
10-09-2012, 02:54 PM
|
|
|
Title: Senior Contributor
|
|
Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
|
Car: 2005 SWP Legacy GT
|
|
Posts: 713
|
|
iTrader: (2)
|
|
nokians are amazing
|
|
#7:
10-10-2012, 05:10 AM
|
|
|
Title: Monkey
|
|
Posts: 1,513
|
|
iTrader: (0)
|
|
According to Consumer Report the winter tires to have this season (studless winter to be precise) are Michelin X-Ice Xi3 ir Xi2.
Check their Nov 2012 edition.
Krzys
|
|
#8:
10-10-2012, 07:08 AM
|
|
|
Title: My new race "car"
|
|
Rank: Donating Member
|
|
Location: ne
|
|
Car: 05 mt wagon stage 5 suspension
|
|
Posts: 7,853
|
|
iTrader: (0)
|
|
Toyo Garits hx
__________________
"Belief does not make truth. Evidence makes truth. And belief does not make evidence."
|
|
#9:
10-10-2012, 01:35 PM
|
|
|
Title: Poo-Flinging Monkey
|
|
Rank: Donating Member
|
|
Location: Southeastern WI
|
|
Car: 06 LGT 5EAT Daily Driver
|
|
Posts: 2,472
|
|
iTrader: (11)
|
|
Nokian is a Finnish brand-- in Finland, in order to get your license, you have to learn how to perform emergency maneuvers on snowy roads since lots of roads there do not get plowed. Finnish drivers know a thing or two about car control. (Ever heard the saying "If you want to win, hire a Finn." ?) That being said, if you can afford the Nokians, get them.
|
|
#10:
10-10-2012, 03:38 PM
|
|
|
Title: Senior Monkey
|
|
Location: Chicago
|
|
Car: 08 Spec. B/Supra 91T
|
|
Posts: 1,783
|
|
iTrader: (35)
|
|
I'd answer outahere's questions then buy whatever he recommends.
With that said, I had to drive like a total ass to get my WS60s to break loose on maybe 2" of wet snow. Those things gripped abd I would expect the WS70s to be better.
|
|
#11:
10-10-2012, 10:33 PM
|
|
|
Title: iTroll
|
|
Rank: Donating Member
|
|
Car: RWD Subaru
|
|
Posts: 1,219
|
|
iTrader: (7)
|
|
What's wrong with Contis? Per last season's euro tests, they seemed on par with Hakka R's overall (assuming ContiVikingContact 5 is the same tire), although offering slightly different mix of characteristics.
__________________
666
|
|
#12:
10-11-2012, 08:59 AM
|
|
|
Title: Contributing V.P.
|
|
Location: south jersey
|
|
Posts: 1,018
|
|
iTrader: (0)
|
|
Nothing wrong with Contis. I bought a set of TS740s back in the 80s when Continental first introduced "thermogummi". Great tires then and better now. Conti bought General Tire and that's where General got the smarts for the Altimax Arctic.
|
|
#13:
10-11-2012, 09:13 AM
|
|
|
Title: Member
|
|
Location: Mississauga, ON
|
|
Car: 2005 Legacy GT LTD Wagon 5mt
|
|
Posts: 95
|
|
iTrader: (0)
|
|
Wow, thanks for the responses guys!
I've never had Bridgestone, and I've always known Nokian to be top of the line. One of the things that are making me lean towards the Nokian is the low rolling resistance which should in theory save gas mileage.
I'm in Toronto, Ontario so we get every type of snow you can imagine. Deep, slush, hard packed, black ice, you name it! I also drive up north to go snowboarding and that's usually deeper or hard packed snow, sometimes ice.
I've been reading a lot of reviews on 1010tires and Tire Rack and the Michelin's Xi2 just isn't cutting it for me if I'm going to be paying that price.
I appreciate all the other suggestions, but from my original list, I narrowed it down to those two as they had the best reviews from multiple sources!
Nokian Hakka R's
Toyo Garit XK
Bridgestone Blizzak WS70
Bridgestone Blizzak LM60
Conti ExtremeWinterContact
Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice WRT
General Altimax
Michelin's Xi2
Looks like I'll be getting the Nokian's! I wasn't too happy with the Conti ExtremeWinterContact on my '99 Legacy. They were too soft for my liking, so the performance aspect wasn't what I was used too compared to my previous Kumho's on there (those were awesome!) Great tire, but I felt a little squirrely in some types of snow.
|
|
#14:
10-11-2012, 09:18 AM
|
|
|
Title: That Guy
|
|
Rank: Premium Donator
|
|
Location: Somers, CT
|
|
Car: 2008 QSM Unicorn, 2008 DGM camry
|
|
Posts: 1,140
|
|
iTrader: (6)
|
|
My WS70's performed AWESOME but their wear sucked really bad. You'd be lucky to get two seasons out of the unless you drive on snow all the time. I've heard nothing but good things about the general arcticMax's, considering their price
|
|
#15:
10-11-2012, 01:01 PM
|
|
|
Title: HighIntensityDenial
|
|
Location: Idaho
|
|
Car: '05 Legacy GT Wagon 5MT
|
|
Posts: 2,193
|
|
iTrader: (3)
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay-d
..................Looks like I'll be getting the Nokian's! .............
|
Nokian R is always a great choice for snow and slush, as long as you don't mind paying the "Nokian tax".
Here is a recent 2012 test of the HakkaR vs Xi2, Conti CVC5, Dunlop DS3, Toyo Garit G4. Use Google Translate.
http://www.autoreview.ru/_archive/se...ECTION_ID=7083
Last edited by outahere; 10-11-2012 at 01:03 PM..
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 PM.
| |