Originally Posted by throttlehappy
5.8L/100Km's actually but who is counting
Emission tuning is not the best for fuel economy so fuel economy comes down to cam timing and deriving as much energy from the crank as possible(benefits of D.AVCS)
The 610 miles to a tank was with the driver only, just pointing out the tune was aggressive and not a limp eco tune.
I'll admit - I didn't realize you were the same throttlehappy from over on the RR forums, etc. With a post count of 4, I thought maybe a troll.
I'll still take your claims with a pinch of salt, but not a barrel anymore