Originally Posted by zambazil
Turbo or NA? I'd get whichever would make me happy & with the least regrets since I'll be the one driving it. 0.02 cents.
I'm pretty torn between these two choices right now:
2009 3.0R with 60K
2008 LGT with 30K.
The 3.0R is $1k less than the LGT, and twice as far away from me.
I failed to mention before that this car will be a "pleasure" car, as I have a company vehicle for work. It'll get driven mainly on the weekends, so I won't be putting 60 miles a day on anymore like I did before I had the company Jeep getting to/from work.
Would I be a fool to pass up an LGT with 30K miles priced at $18k for a 3.0R with double the miles but a year newer and a thousand cheaper? What a dilemma... LOL!!!