Jump to content
LegacyGT.com

LittleBlueGT

I Donated
  • Posts

    4,351
  • Joined

About LittleBlueGT

  • Birthday 04/21/1975

Personal Information

  • Location
    Winnipeg
  • Car
    05 Atlantic Blue non-limited GT MT
  • Interests
    Reefing, 4-door "sports cars"
  • Occupation
    ATC

Converted

  • User Title
    RS4 killer

LittleBlueGT's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Interesting, I haven't been tuning a lot lately due to building a house (and a really really nice garage). But I may have a new STI on order by the winter.
  2. Interesting about the target boost value. That being said, I don't think Bill has ever written anything like that in his ECU analysis area in RR. Although I do learn new things everyday. FWIW everytime I have seen FLKC go up, it was evidence by an increase in knock sum. Also, if you raise the load value for IAM evaluation, you don't stop the ECU from reacting, you just stop it from using IAM as a way to react, it can still use FBKC or FLKC.
  3. Then change the IAM load parameters, can't remember what it is called off hand, but it is the part that says what loads the ECU can make changes to the IAM. On my old LGT with my clutch I had to have it not change IAM unless the load was above about 2.0 or so.
  4. Doesn't affect me right now, but thanks for doing this research. Helps the community a lot, can save a lot of people a lot of troubleshooting time.
  5. I am interested in your theories, cause that launch makes no sense, unless lots of cars there get launches in that ball-park.
  6. I was thinking about this the other day. The 9 second Subarus are pulling 1.4-1.6 60 foot times, the 11 sec ones are doing mostly 1.7-1.8 with the odd 1.6. I really don't think you did a 1.384 60 foot time.
  7. Nice, keep me posted. That will be my next toy car 5 years down the road :).
  8. I don't know what happened to that thread.

     

    Yes I have the money, but I will not acquire til next May. I really don't think it will cost much more then a highly modded STI.

     

    I need to see from the couple of locals as to if it will make a decent DD in our winters.

     

    I will update this forum next year with whatever car I decide to get, but the case for the GTR seems pretty good right now.

  9. I'm enjoying my little EVO :)
  10. So did you get the GTR. I would go with that hands down if you have the cash.
  11. You got a 1.38 60 foot time? I am working on a tune right now for an AutoX guy (using ATR) and we are making the fans come on at a lower temp, I don't think we have that with OS for the 05 LGT, but it is an interesting idea.
  12. yea, high IAT are a problem, had it in my car too, 186F IAT and when I airboy'd the run I was at 250 whp, even though 20 mins earlier I was at 300+ (this was 3 years ago). You need to tune for high IAT. Look at your target boost, real low. You likely have target boost reducing based off of IAT.
  13. True statements, but may I add the required 4th gear high load scenario. None of these will spool anywhere close to that in 2nd gear, which is used a whole lot for many DDs in the city.
  14. That is not normal. Properly tuned that will not happen. (unless you had a bad tank of gas or something)
  15. Knock sum results in one of 4 things: -nothing -FBKC (usually seen when load is quickly changing) -FLKC (usually seen when load is stable) -IAM change (usually seen after FLKC has already retarded things a bit)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use